We call them L2s because they took 2 Ls in 24 hours

I don't have the data but it seems like: 1. The majority of x-chain bridging is stablecoins 2. The proportion of all bridging attributable to stablecoins is growing all the time Stables are connecting everything, and stablecoin issuers are about to be the real bridges

Blockchain devs -- I have heard many times that TPS and other "performance metrics" are BS (+ I've seen many teams stretch their own numbers) What are actually useful ways to measure performance? We want to optimize the hell out of Cosmos latency and throughput

Question the quietness of the cosmos

Probably nothing

My bet: In the long run, asset issuers who can mint the asset themselves and use their reserves to “insure” token holders against finality risk are the only “solvers” that matter. Circle is leading the way with CCTP V2: - instant transfers - 1 bip fee - 10-100m in capacity

Amazing turnout and tons of new Cosmos EVM chains announced and launched: 1/ @Ripple’s EVM side chain launched 2/ @TacBuild - the telegram defi chain 3/ @babylonlabs_io - BTC defi hub (And unlike other stacks, we don’t need to pay these teams $100m to build with us)

BTC brought to you by eureka

Happy 4th Birthday @osmosiszone!

One of the best new teams building on the Cosmos hub is just starting their fundraise to build a 15% high-yield savings protocol -- only possible on the hub's multichain dev platform DM me if you're interested in meeting them